Abstract

Fogelin holds a grounds analysis of 'S knows that p' and relates it to levels of scrutiny that engender both (a) epistemic-responsibilityin-context and (b) hyperbolic doubt as relevant for knowledge claims. The specter of relativism appears with the possibility that grounds could be swallowed by context, but Fogelin is not prey to that blunder. Context-in Fogelin's paper-becomes a useful device used by an epistemic mechanism that heightens levels of scrutiny allowing us to amend knowledge claims made somehow in haste; on the other hand, context level also becomes a useful device to understand the workings of skepticism and one that allows

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call