What Happens After a Stop the Bleed Class? The Contrast Between Theory and Practice

Abstract

The Department of Homeland Security launched the Stop the Bleed initiative, a campaign intended to teach bystanders hemorrhage control strategies. Despite the program's popularity, little is known about actions taken by participants afterwards. We sought to determine how often participants acquired the equipment that is necessary in applying the skills taught. A standardized survey instrument was distributed to all American College of Surgeons Bleeding Control Basic (B-Con) class participants from 05/2017 to 01/2018. The instrument queried about the likelihood of applying skills and obtaining materials. A web-based survey was administered one month later inquiring whether materials were obtained and barriers that would prohibit acquisition. Academic, urban, Level I trauma center. Healthcare and nonhealthcare personnel. There were 336 and 183 participants who completed the initial and subsequent web-based survey, respectively. Participants indicated a high likelihood of applying a tourniquet (95.5%), applying pressure (97.9%), and packing a wound (96.4%), if required. Additionally, 74.7% and 76.2% reported a high likelihood of obtaining a tourniquet and packing material, respectively. However, only 21.3% and 50.8% obtained a tourniquet and packing material, respectively, 1 month later. Cost, time, and accessibility of items during a time of need were cited to be common reasons for not obtaining these materials. Despite reporting a high likelihood of utilizing hemorrhage control skills upon completion of the B-Con class, few went on to acquire the materials needed to apply these skills among those who responded. These results may be impacted by loss of follow up and response bias. Developing strategies that allow for easy access to materials is imperative and may lead to both better implementation of the purposes of the program and improved dissemination of its principles within the community.