Abstract

Using clinical material and an allegory, I argue that Freud's lack of attention to the clinical theory of psychoanalysis set a course that has led to considerable ambiguity and confusion about what actually occurs in an analysis. In “Fragment of an Analysis of a Case of Hysteria,” Freud (1905) described very little of his interactive experiences with Dora and minimized his most humane contribution to Dora.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.