Abstract

Given that we know that policy making is 'iterative, continuous, incremental, subject to review and inherently political', how does evidence feed into policy? The term 'evidence-based policy' has become routinely used in government policy deliberations, but the rhetoric is often not matched by the reality. The systematic integration of evidence into policy and practice is rare. There is also ongoing debate on what constitutes evidence for policy. This paper proposes a way of categorizing, according to source, the evidence used for policy making. We draw on the literature and on the ideas and experiences of the key people (referred to here as policy 'actors') involved in the development of policies that support families and the early years of life in NSW and South Australia. The findings from this study suggest that a variety of types of evidence inform health policy making. This challenges the public health community to broaden its ideas on what constitutes evidence for policy and to recognize the validity of different types of evidence in better informing the policy process.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.