Abstract

It is widely accepted that the Marginal Value Theorem (MVT) describes optimal foraging strategies of animals and the mechanism proposed by the MVT has been supported by a number of field observations. However, findings of many researchers indicate that in natural conditions foragers do not always behave according to the MVT. To address this inconsistency, in a series of computer simulation experiments, we examined the behaviour of four types of foragers having specific foraging efficiencies and using the MVT strategies in 15 different landscapes in an ideal environment (no intra-and inter-specific interactions). We used data on elk (Cervus elaphus) to construct our virtual forager. Contrary to the widely accepted understanding of the MVT (residence time in a patch should be longer in environments where travel time between patches is longer) we found that in environments with the same average patch quality and varying average travel times between patches, patch residence times of some foragers are not affected by travel times. Based on our analysis we propose a mechanism responsible for this observation and formulate the perfect forager theorem (PFT). We also introduce the concepts of a foraging coefficient (F) and foragers’ hub (α), and propose a model to describe the relationship between the perfect forager and all other forager types.

Highlights

  • Nutritional status and energy budgets are key determinants of survival and reproductive success of animals

  • In landscapes of type C, the longest Tr was 4.2 h resulting from a combination of long average travel time (4 h), high average patch biomass and low efficiency of the forager E 875.88

  • Analysis of the research findings presented in this paper suggest that for a given landscape there is only one average travel time travel times (Tt) such that for this specific average Tt, the residence time

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Nutritional status and energy budgets are key determinants of survival and reproductive success of animals. A variety of parameters affect the availability and accessibility of food for wildlife and, to utilize forage resources, each individual needs to respond to these environmental factors. Individual animals have specific abilities to exploit available resources and may use different foraging strategies to satisfy their food requirements. It is widely accepted that the Marginal Value Theorem (MVT) [1] explains the foraging behavior and describes the optimal foraging strategy. The MVT forms the foundation of the classical foraging theory that is fundamental to behavioral ecology. Some authors [8,9,10,11], argued that foraging strategies other than the MVT could be used by foragers

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call