Abstract

Background: Neurosurgery carries a risk of post-operative deterioration that can be detected using neurological observations (NO). NO are frequently requested by surgeons using the phrase ‘routine post-op neuro obs’. There is no agreed definition of what this means. Aims: To identify the range of possible interpretations of the phrase ‘routine post-op neuro obs’ by nurses and surgeons. Method: National policy analysis, literature review, notes audit and survey methods were used to identify national and local practice. Data were analysed descriptively using Excel. Findings: Two out of 15 policies contained observation guidance. Fifteen surgeons used five terms to describe post-operative observations. ‘Routine’ was used to describe observation frequency anywhere between every 15 minutes and every 4 hours. Nurses varied in their interpretation, and frequency was based on clinical judgement. Conclusion: Post-operative instructions and nursing practice vary. There is a need and desire for clear evidence-based guidelines to ensure consistency and patient safety.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call