Abstract
Although modern humans exhibit many different morphologies, anthropological wisdom dictates that an effective bipedal foot is one with an adducted first metatarsal (MT) and medial longitudinal arch (MLA). The recently announced pedal morphology of Ardipithecus calls into question this assumption, prompting the question of what variation among modern human feet might reveal about the function of extinct hominid feet.Using anterior‐posterior and lateral radiographs of 50 osteological adults (aged 15–78 years, 25 women), arch height and the angle between MTs (MT12, MT23, MT34, MT45, MT15) were measured. MT12 of STW 575 and MT angles of OH 8 were measured on photographs/drawings of reconstructions.In the modern sample, MT12 ranged from 3–15° (mean = 9°, σ = 3°) and feet with more abducted 1st MT tended to have more abducted 5th MT (p = 0.051) and higher arches (p=0.018). MT12 measured 20° on STW 575 and 10° on OH 8.For MT12, STW 575 is > 3σ from the human mean, while OH 8 exhibits the human mean value. If the fossil reconstructions are accurate representations of weight‐bearing position, then the 1st MT of STW 575 was more abducted than is typically seen in modern humans, but what, if any, functional consequences accrue from this difference are less clear. As with other morphological features, effective bipedal feet can come in many forms.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.