What do young people think about the extension of compulsory education?

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Questions about the optimum age for young people to complete their compulsory education, and how this relates to issues of equity, are familiar topics of debate in many jurisdictions. The aim of educational equity has been fundamental in Finnish education, upheld through decades of reforms. A recent reform has extended compulsory education in Finland to the age of 18. As part of gaining insight into its implications, more needs to be understood about how it is perceived by young people in education settings. Purpose This study sought to explore young people’s perceptions of extended compulsory education in the context of the recent reform in Finland. Methods A total of 19 focus group interviews were carried out with 56 15-to-16-year-olds who were among the first cohort of young people experiencing the extension to compulsory education. Data were analysed qualitatively, using a discourse-analytical approach. Findings Three main discourses emerged, which helped illuminate the young people’s views: (i) grade discourse, (ii) potential equity discourse and (iii) part-of-the-system discourse. Goals and pressure to succeed were emphasised through grade discourse; the extension was also discussed in terms of equity around provision of accessible information and access to education. While most participants deemed completing secondary education self-evident, doubts arose about the system’s flexibility and whether it might hinder choice. Different discourses slightly influenced agency; grade discourse reinforced young people’s goal-oriented stance. Conclusion This study highlights how certain ‘ideal’ positions may be favoured among young people considering various educational and career paths. While effective for those with clear goals, it could discourage deviation from peers’ choices. The findings draw attention more broadly to the need for quality study guidance and wellbeing prioritisation for all young people as they negotiate transitional points in their individual learning journeys.