Abstract

The fossil record of pinnipeds (seals, fur seals and walruses) is globally distributed, spanning from the late Oligocene to the Holocene. This record shows a complex evolutionary history that could not otherwise be inferred from their extant relatives, including multiple radiations and iterative ecomorphological specializations among different lineages, many of which are extinct. The fossil record of pinnipeds is not uniformly represented in space and time, however, leaving some gaps in our knowledge. We performed a historiographical investigation of the published fossil record of pinnipeds based on the information available in the Paleobiology Database, with the aim to broadly characterize and evaluate it from a taxonomic, geographical and temporal perspective. We identified major trends, strengths and weaknesses of the pinniped fossil record, including potential biases that may affect our interpretations. We found that 39% of the record corresponds to extant taxa, which are essentially from the Pleistocene and Holocene. There is a larger record from the Northern Hemisphere, suggesting biases in sampling and collection effort. The record is not strongly biased by sedimentary outcrop bias. Specifically, for extinct species, nearly half of them are represented by a single occurrence and a large proportion have type specimens consisting of single isolated postcranial elements. While the pinniped fossil record may have adequate temporal and taxonomic coverage, it has a strong geographical bias and its comparability is hindered by the incompleteness of type specimens. These results should be taken into account when addressing patterns of their past diversity, evolutionary history and paleoecology.

Highlights

  • Among living marine mammals, pinnipeds constitute the second most species-rich clade, comprising 33 widely distributed extant species in three subclades: Phocidae, Otariidae and Odobenidae with only one extant species, walruses (Odobenus rosmarus; [1,2])

  • We explored the association between sedimentary rock outcrop area from the Neogene of the USA and the number of reported occurrences of fossil pinnipeds from this area, using unpublished marine rock area data collected by Uhen & Pyenson [10] in 2007

  • We propose that the disparity in the number of published fossil record of pinnipeds during the middle Miocene and Pliocene between the two regions is likely associated with differential sampling and publication efforts, along with the number of vertebrate paleontologists working in the field

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Pinnipeds constitute the second most species-rich clade, comprising 33 widely distributed extant species in three subclades: Phocidae (true seals, with 19 species), Otariidae (fur seals and sea lions, with 14 species) and Odobenidae with only one extant species, walruses (Odobenus rosmarus; [1,2]). It is clear that pinnipeds were different in the geologic past, showing greater species richness in some groups, different ecomorphologies, body sizes and geographical distributions [2]. [8,9]) These attributes may bias the fossil record of pinnipeds in a similar way to the fossil record of cetaceans and sirenians, which show biases in geography, preservation and historiography [10,11]. It remains unclear how potential sources of bias, such as geographical and temporal occurrences, or sampling effort, affect our knowledge and interpretations of the fossil record of pinnipeds

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.