Abstract

I examine the role of governance characteristics in determining the probability of a firm undergoing a going private transaction. I find that firms with greater board control are more likely to go private while firms with strong anti-takeover provisions are more likely to be acquired by other public companies. The positive relationship between greater board control and the likelihood of going private is driven by private equity backed deals. On the other hand, the negative relationship between anti-takeover provisions and the probability of going private is driven by non private equity backed deals. In addition, I find that shareholder voting restrictions do not affect firms’ survival status while a higher number of state antitakeover laws reduces the likelihood of being acquired. Finally, abnormal returns to shareholders are much lower for going private transactions than for acquisitions by public firms. The results suggest that governance provisions affect shareholder wealth during change of control transactions by playing an important role in determining the type of acquirer.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.