Abstract

The origin of extant amphibians has been studied using several sources of data and methods, including phylogenetic analyses of morphological data, molecular dating, stratigraphic data, and integration of ossification sequence data, but a consensus about their affinities with other Paleozoic tetrapods has failed to emerge. We have compiled five datasets to assess the relative support for six competing hypotheses about the origin of extant amphibians: a monophyletic origin among temnospondyls, a monophyletic origin among lepospondyls, a diphyletic origin among both temnospondyls and lepospondyls, a diphyletic origin among temnospondyls alone, and two variants of a triphyletic origin, in which anurans and urodeles come from different temnospondyl taxa while caecilians come from lepospondyls and are either closer to anurans and urodeles or to amniotes. Our datasets comprise ossification sequences of up to 107 terminal taxa and up to eight cranial bones, and up to 65 terminal taxa and up to seven appendicular bones, respectively. Among extinct taxa, only two or three temnospondyl can be analyzed simultaneously for cranial data, but this is not an insuperable problem because each of the six tested hypotheses implies a different position of temnospondyls and caecilians relative to other sampled taxa. For appendicular data, more extinct taxa can be analyzed, including some lepospondyls and the finned tetrapodomorph Eusthenopteron, in addition to temnospondyls. The data are analyzed through maximum likelihood, and the AICc (corrected Akaike Information Criterion) weights of the six hypotheses allow us to assess their relative support. By an unexpectedly large margin, our analyses of the cranial data support a monophyletic origin among lepospondyls; a monophyletic origin among temnospondyls, the current near-consensus, is a distant second. All other hypotheses are exceedingly unlikely according to our data. Surprisingly, analysis of the appendicular data supports triphyly of extant amphibians within a clade that unites lepospondyls and temnospondyls, contrary to all phylogenies based on molecular data and recent trees based on paleontological data, but this conclusion is not very robust.

Highlights

  • Peer Community Journal is a member of the Centre Mersenne for Open Scientific Publishing http:// www.centre-mersenne.org/

  • In addition to classical phylogenetic analyses of morphological data matrices, these include the use of molecular dating (Zhang et al, 2005; Marjanović and Laurin, 2007; Pardo et al, 2017a) and stratigraphic data (Marjanović and Laurin, 2008) to compare the inferred divergence dates between the three main extant amphibian clades on the basis of molecular data with predictions based on the fossil record under the TH and the lepospondyl hypothesis (LH) on the one hand, and the polyphyly hypothesis (PH) and the DH on the other hand

  • Our datasets fit some tree topologies much better than others. Both the tests using CoMET and squared-change parsimony with random taxon reshuffling overwhelmingly support the presence of a strong phylogenetic signal in the cranial data; the null hypothesis of the absence of a phylogenetic signal can be rejected in both cases, given that it has a probability of < 10−97 for the cranial and < 10−4 for the appendicular dataset, according to CoMET

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Peer Community Journal is a member of the Centre Mersenne for Open Scientific Publishing http:// www.centre-mersenne.org/. Developmental data, in the form of ossification sequences, have been the second-most frequently used (after classic morphological data) to argue for particular phylogenetic hypotheses. These data include mainly cranial (e.g., Schoch, 2002, 2006; Schoch and Carroll, 2003; Schoch and Milner, 2004; Anderson, 2007; Carroll, 2007; Germain and Laurin, 2009) and autopodial ossification sequences (e.g., Fröbisch et al, 2007, 2015). This study relies on both cranial and appendicular ossification sequences and compares their implications for tetrapod phylogeny

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call