Abstract

BackgroundThis study concerns the perception of musical segmentation during listening to live contemporary classical music. Little is known about how listeners form judgments of musical segments, particularly when typical section markers, such as cadences and fermatas, are absent [e.g., Sears et al. (2014)] or when the music is non-tonal (e.g., in much contemporary classical music).AimsThe current study aimed to examine the listeners’ segmentation decisions in a piece of contemporary music, Ligeti’s “Fanfares”?MethodsData were gathered using a smartphone application [Practice & Research in Science & Music (PRiSM) Perception App] designed for this study by the Royal Northern College of Music (RNCM) Centre for PRiSM and the Oxford e-Research Centre. A total of 259 audience participants were asked to “tap” when they felt that a section had ended. Subjective responses were captured, as well as contextual data about the participants.ResultsThe audience members demonstrated high levels of agreement regarding segmentation, mostly at places in the music involving breaks in the musical texture (one piano hand resting), changes in dynamic (volume), and changes in register/pitch. A sense of familiarity with contemporary repertoire did seem to influence the responses—the participants who self-reported being familiar with contemporary music used a wider range of cues to make their segmentation decisions. The self-report data analysis suggested that the listeners were not always aware of how they made decisions regarding segmentation. The factors which may influence their judgment of musical segmentation are, to some extent, similar to those identified by music analysis (Steinitz, 2011) but different in other ways. The effect of musical training was found to be quite small.ConclusionWhether musically trained and/or familiar with contemporary classical music or not, the listeners demonstrate commonalities in segmentation, which they are not always aware of. This study has implications for contemporary composers, performers, and audiences and how they engage with new music in particular.

Highlights

  • When we listen to a piece of music, we perceive the information as consisting of separate units or events (Drake and Bertrand, 2001)

  • The results suggest that familiarity with contemporary classical music in general may influence the segmentation decisions when listening to this piece

  • This study suggests that listeners do agree on segment boundaries when listening to this piece of contemporary classical music in a live concert hall setting as evidenced in their responses to segmentation in real time using a bespoke smartphone app

Read more

Summary

Introduction

When we listen to a piece of music, we perceive the information as consisting of separate units or events (Drake and Bertrand, 2001) Such a process may be referred to as grouping (Lerdahl and Jackendoff, 1983), chunking (Miller, 1956), or segmentation (Cambouropoulos, 2006). How listeners infer such chunks of information or segment the auditory stream may be influenced by multiple factors These may include individual differences, such as musical expertise, and/or features in the music itself, for example, when the music changes significantly in some way (for example, in modality or tempo). Little is known about how listeners form judgments of musical segments, when typical section markers, such as cadences and fermatas, are absent [e.g., Sears et al (2014)] or when the music is non-tonal (e.g., in much contemporary classical music)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call