Abstract

As argumentation is an activity at the heart of mathematics, (not only) German school curricula request students to construct mathematical arguments, which get evaluated by teachers. However, it remains unclear which criteria teachers use to decide on a specific grade in a summative assessment setting. In this paper, we draw on two sources for these criteria: First, we present theoretically derived dimensions along which arguments can be assessed. Second, a qualitative interview study with 16 teachers from German secondary schools provides insights in their criteria developed in practice. Based on the detailed presentation of the case of one teacher, the paper then illustrates how criteria developed in practice take a variety of different aspects into account and also correspond with the theoretically identified dimensions. The findings are discussed in terms of implications for the teaching and learning about mathematical argumentation in school and university: An emphasis on more pedagogical criteria in high school offers one explanation to the perceived gap between school and university level mathematics.

Highlights

  • Proving and argumentation are important activities in mathematics and in mathematics education

  • They learn about mathematical arguments and proofs in school

  • While a lot of research is put into identifying challenges and scaffolding of mathematical argumentation in school, one aspect of practice has received less attention: the assessment of learners’ arguments by teachers

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Proving and argumentation are important activities in mathematics and in mathematics education. As different studies show (e.g., Balacheff, 2010; Kempen & Biehler, 2015), dealing with proofs at a university level is a huge challenge for many students, even though. They learn about mathematical arguments and proofs in school. The intention of the present study is to address criteria for evaluating mathematical arguments first from a theoretical point of view, before identifying criteria developed in practice by teachers. Combining the two perspectives aims to provide comprehensive insights and to further the discussion on teaching argumentation and proof

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call