Abstract
Abstract. We examine what can be learnt about climate sensitivity from variability in the surface air temperature record over the instrumental period, from around 1880 to the present. While many previous studies have used trends in observational time series to constrain equilibrium climate sensitivity, it has also been argued that temporal variability may also be a powerful constraint. We explore this question in the context of a simple widely used energy balance model of the climate system. We consider two recently proposed summary measures of variability and also show how the full information content can be optimally used in this idealised scenario. We find that the constraint provided by variability is inherently skewed, and its power is inversely related to the sensitivity itself, discriminating most strongly between low sensitivity values and weakening substantially for higher values. It is only when the sensitivity is very low that the variability can provide a tight constraint. Our investigations take the form of “perfect model” experiments, in which we make the optimistic assumption that the model is structurally perfect and all uncertainties (including the true parameter values and nature of internal variability noise) are correctly characterised. Therefore the results might be interpreted as a best-case scenario for what we can learn from variability, rather than a realistic estimate of this. In these experiments, we find that for a moderate sensitivity of 2.5 ∘C, a 150-year time series of pure internal variability will typically support an estimate with a 5 %–95% range of around 5 ∘C (e.g. 1.9–6.8 ∘C). Total variability including that due to the forced response, as inferred from the detrended observational record, can provide a stronger constraint with an equivalent 5 %–95 % posterior range of around 4 ∘C (e.g. 1.8–6.0 ∘C) even when uncertainty in aerosol forcing is considered. Using a statistical summary of variability based on autocorrelation and the magnitude of residuals after detrending proves somewhat less powerful as a constraint than the full time series in both situations. Our results support the analysis of variability as a potentially useful tool in helping to constrain equilibrium climate sensitivity but suggest caution in the interpretation of precise results.
Highlights
For many years, researchers have analysed the warming of the climate system as observed in the modern instrumental temperature record, in order to understand the response of the climate system to external forcing
Some research has focused on the temporal variability exhibited in the surface air temperature record (Schwartz, 2007; Cox et al, 2018a), which is the focus of this paper
While the statistic can be informative on S, the constraint it provides based on internal variability in the case of unforced simulations is rather limited
Summary
Researchers have analysed the warming of the climate system as observed in the modern instrumental temperature record (spanning the mid-19th to early-21st century), in order to understand the response of the climate system to external forcing. . It has been cogently argued that an emergent constraint should only be taken seriously if supported by some theoretical basis (Caldwell et al, 2014), and Cox et al (2018a) did present an analysis – again based on simple zerodimensional energy balance modelling – which qualitatively underpinned this linear relationship. We explore the question of to what extent temporal variability in the globally and annually averaged temperature record can be used to constrain equilibrium climate sensitivity. We consider both the internal variability in the climate system itself and the total variability including deviation from a linear trend due to the forced response. Throughout the paper, the term variability refers to all temporal variation in the annually averaged temperature time series after any linear trend is removed
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
