Abstract
The role of fire in determining biome distribution in South Africa has long been debated. Acocks labelled veld types that he thought were ‘fire climax’ as ‘false’. He hypothesised that their current extent was due to extensive forest clearance by Iron Age farmers. We tested the relative importance of fire and climate in determining ecosystem characteristics by simulating potential vegetation of South Africa with and without fire using a Dynamic Global Vegetation Model (DGVM). The simulations suggest that most of the eastern half of the country could support much higher stem biomass without fire and that the vegetation would be dominated by trees instead of grasses. Fynbos regions in mesic winter rainfall areas would also become tree dominated. We collated results of long term fire exclusion studies to further test the relative importance of fire and climate. These show that grassy ecosystems with rainfall > 650mm tend towards fire-sensitive forests with fire excluded. Areas below 650mm showed changes in tree density and size but no trend of changing composition to forest. We discuss recent evidence that C 4 grasslands first appeared between 6 and 8M years BP, long before the appearance of modern humans. However these grassy ecosystems are among the most recently developed biomes on the planet. We briefly discuss the importance of fire in promoting their spread in the late Tertiary.
Highlights
The great German biogeographer, Schimper (1903), observed that global patterns of vegetation were broadly correlated with climate
In order to explain why such large areas of the country were not at equilibrium with climate, Acocks suggested that forests had been cleared by Iron Age farmers causing their replacement by earlier successional grasslands or ‘macchia’
He drew a map of South African vegetation as it might have looked in 1400 AD — just before Iron Age settlement according to the consensus at that time
Summary
The great German biogeographer, Schimper (1903), observed that global patterns of vegetation were broadly correlated with climate. Acocks implied that large areas of fynbos were far from their climate potential and labelled most of the eastern half of the Fynbos Biome as ‘False’ macchia. In order to explain why such large areas of the country were not at equilibrium with climate, Acocks suggested that forests had been cleared by Iron Age farmers causing their replacement by earlier successional grasslands or ‘macchia’. He drew a map of South African vegetation as it might have looked in 1400 AD — just before Iron Age settlement according to the consensus at that time. We assemble new evidence for the origin of grassy ecosystems and propose a new hypothesis for the
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.