Abstract
China imitated U.S.'s CFIUS review and established the ministerial joint conference to undertake its own foreign investment national security review in 2011. Yet regulation on the ministerial joint conference is inadequate. An in-depth study of the composition of CFIUS finds that Chinese joint conference could make progress at several aspects. A detailed explanation of the potential conference members will make the review process more transparent. The Leadership of the Standing Committee of the Political Bureau or the Chairman would enhance the authority of the national security review. The single supervision mode is recommended to avoid potential conflict of interests among conference members. And the head of involved departments is more suitable to be regulated as the members of the joint conference. Index Terms - CFIUS, the Joint Conference, Foreign Investment National Security Review, U.S., China
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
