What can be achieved with a single-payer NHI system: The case of Taiwan

Abstract

The United Nations has incorporated the noble goal of Universal Health Coverage (UHC) in its 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Most nations have already embraced UHC as their goal. However, an intense policy debate has risen about which health system structure can best achieve UHC. Is a single-payer system more efficient, equitable and effective than a multiple-payer system for middle income countries? We argue that empirical evidence and in-depth analysis of single-payer and multiple-payer systems should inform this debate. First, we need a clear definition of single- and multiple-payer health systems that enables us to compare their differences and clarify the issues to be debated. Second, at least four key issues confront any nation that wishes to achieve UHC: (1) how to design an affordable comprehensive health benefit package for UHC and to finance it (2) how the health expenditure inflation rate can be managed to sustain UHC (3) how modern information technology can be used to enhance efficiency and quality of healthcare and (4) how to assure an adequate supply of high-quality services will be distributed equitably throughout a nation. This paper offers a definition of single- and multiple-payer and compares them. We then use Taiwan's National Health Insurance system to address the four key issues, and illuminate how its policies and operations led to Taiwan's successful UHC.