Abstract

In the last 25 years, cognitive scientists have come to see that using more than one language is a natural circumstance of human experience, not an exceptional condition that produces disordered speaking or thinking (1). The revision of previously held negative views about bilingualism is largely attributable to the finding that although bilinguals appear to activate both languages when reading, listening to speech, and speaking one language alone, they do not suffer notable disruptions (2). Bilingual speakers can choose the language they wish to speak, but at the same, switch back and forth from one language to the other, often in midsentence, with others who are similarly bilingual. The evidence suggests that the consequences of bilingualism are largely positive, with features of bilingual minds and brains reflecting the benefits of a life spent negotiating the presence of two languages and acquiring the skill to select the appropriate language in the intended context (3, 4). In a fascinating PNAS report, Zhang et al. (5) demonstrate that bilingual speakers are sensitive to cultural cues in the environment that signal the presence of the native language. Contrary to the claim that bilingualism confers benefits to those who speak more than one language, the form of the sensitivity demonstrated in the Zhang et al. research is negative, with slower speech when speaking the second language, L2, in the presence of first language, L1. Most dramatically, these disruptions to L2 speech occur when bilinguals are speaking to the faces of other bilinguals with the same L1.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call