Abstract
This article reviews a study of five leading journals of the field of conflict resolution and peace. It tabulates the importance of five elements in all articles appearing in these journals from 1990–2000. It finds that most articles address theory and practice, less address research, and a very small proportion are concerned with ethics or service. The study shows that this pattern largely is independent of the gender or intellectual base of the authors. Further, the study shows little change over the years. It concludes that the field systematically has neglected the impact of our thinking and work on those in conflict and suggests that we will imperil the further development of our field if we continue in this way.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
