Abstract

Background:Although appropriate hand hygiene (HH) practices are recognised as the most effective preventative strategy for infection, adherence is suboptimal. Previous studies in intensive care units (ICUs) have found differences in HH compliance between those moments that protect the patient, and those that protect the healthcare provider. However, such studies did not control for other variables known to impact HH compliance.Aim:To examine HH among healthcare workers (HCWs) in ICU settings, and identify whether there is a statistical difference in HH compliance between patient-protective and self-protective moments, while controlling for other variables known to influence HH compliance (i.e. professional role, unit and shift time).Methods:A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in four ICUs across three Irish hospitals. Compliance was assessed according to the WHO’s ‘five moments for hand hygiene’. HCW professional role, total number of ‘opportunities’ for HH and whether compliance was achieved were recorded.Results:A total of 712 HH opportunities were recorded, with an overall compliance rate of 56.9%. Logistic regression analysis revealed that physicians, allied healthcare professionals and auxiliary staff were less likely than nurses to engage in HH. HCWs were more likely to comply during night shifts compared to morning shifts, and with self-protective as compared to patient-protective HH moments.Conclusion:The information provided in this study provides a data-driven approach that ICUs can use to tailor HH interventions to where, when and for whom they are most required.

Highlights

  • Appropriate hand hygiene (HH) practices are recognised as the most effective preventative strategy for infection, adherence is suboptimal

  • Logistic regression analysis revealed that physicians, allied healthcare professionals and auxiliary staff were less likely than nurses to engage in HH

  • healthcare workers (HCWs) were more likely to comply during night shifts compared to morning shifts, and with self-protective as compared to patient-protective HH moments

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Appropriate hand hygiene (HH) practices are recognised as the most effective preventative strategy for infection, adherence is suboptimal. Previous studies in intensive care units (ICUs) have found differences in HH compliance between those moments that protect the patient, and those that protect the healthcare provider. Such studies did not control for other variables known to impact HH compliance. Appropriate hand hygiene (HH) practices are the most effective preventative strategy for HCAIs (Pittet et al, 2006), and are important in intensive care units (ICUs) where patients are critically ill, immuno-compromised and vulnerable to HCAIs (Hughes, 2008). A recent systematic review (Lambe et al, 2019) examining HH compliance across 61 ICU-based studies reported average compliance of 59.6% internationally

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call