Abstract

BackgroundChanges in Dutch policy towards long-term care led to the Dutch Health and Youth Care Inspectorate testing a regulatory framework focusing on care networks around older adults living independently. This regulatory activity involved all care providers and the older adults themselves.MethodsSemi-structured interviews with the older adults, and focus groups with care providers and inspectors were used to assess the perceived added value of, and barriers to the framework.ResultsThe positive elements of this framework were the involvement of the older adults in the regulatory activity, the focus of the framework on care networks and the open character of the conversations with the inspectors. However, applying the framework requires a substantial investment of time. Care providers often did not perceive themselves as being part of a care network around one person and they expressed concerns about financial and privacy issues when thinking in terms of care networks.ConclusionsThe experiences of the client were seen as important in regulating long-term care. Regulating care networks as a whole puts cooperation between care providers involved around one person on the agenda. However, barriers for this form of regulation were also perceived and, therefore, careful consideration when and how to regulate care networks is recommended.

Highlights

  • Changes in Dutch policy towards long-term care led to the Dutch Health and Youth Care Inspectorate testing a regulatory framework focusing on care networks around older adults living independently

  • The Dutch healthcare system is controlled by four principal laws; the Dutch Health Insurance Act (Zvw), the Long Term Care Act (Wlz), the Social Support Act (Wmo) and the Youth Care Act (Jeugdwet) providing a modest role for the government

  • We elaborate on the perspective of the care providers, followed by the perspective of the inspectors, on the potential of, and barriers to, this regulatory framework

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Changes in Dutch policy towards long-term care led to the Dutch Health and Youth Care Inspectorate testing a regulatory framework focusing on care networks around older adults living independently. The Dutch healthcare system is controlled by four principal laws; the Dutch Health Insurance Act (Zvw), the Long Term Care Act (Wlz), the Social Support Act (Wmo) and the Youth Care Act (Jeugdwet) providing a modest role for the government. It has as social insurance background and a dominant role for healthcare insurers [11]. In this study we chose to include welfare providers and volunteers among informal care providers

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.