Abstract
This article examines what has driven voters’ choices in the 2006 presidential election in Portugal. Electing a semipresidential head of state has often been treated either as a “popularity contest” or as a full‐fledged “first‐order” election, depending on the particular national political system in which those elections were studied. Using data from a panel survey conducted following the 2005 legislative and 2006 presidential elections, this article suggests that, in a “premier‐presidentialist” system such as Portugal – where presidents are neither the heads of the executive nor mere figureheads – voters are unlikely to be oblivious to the conventional partisan and ideological cues provided by campaigns, but also unlikely to see these elections as a mechanism with which to hold government accountable. Instead, patterns of defection from the government party seem to conform to theoretical expectations derived from the notion that presidential elections in such cases can be conceived as “less important”, but where parties and voters remain aware of the connections between what is at stake in different electoral arenas.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.