Abstract

Background: To describe factors associated with family physicians (FPs) recruitment and participation in a mental health research project. Methods: 400 FPs were randomly approached for a feasibility study of telephone-supported self-care for depression in adults with chronic physical diseases. FP participation included (1) completing questionnaires at study enrolment and termination to identify personal characteristics, attitudes to patient self-care, and aspects of study implementation; and (2) encouraging patient self-completion of screening forms on depression and comorbid chronic disease in order to assess study eligibility. Outcome measures were the number of FPs who adhered to these tasks, as well as the number of eligible patients recruited from each practice. Chi square and Fisher’s Exact Tests permitted comparison of binary or categorical values, while the Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test was used for continuous scales. Results: Of the 400 FPs randomly selected, 29.8% (119/400) were not reachable by telephone; 42.8% (171/400) were assessed as not meeting eligibility criteria; and 59 (53.6%) of the remaining 110 met eligibility criteria, consented, and participated. Predominant reasons for participation were past experience with research projects, interest in the specific topic of mental health care, enthusiasm about self-care, and sense of collegiality. 86.4% (51/59) completed the study entry questionnaire, and 62.7% (37/59) the end of study questionnaire. 66.1% (39/59) submitted at least one positive screening form (range 1-43), with such participation occurring more often amongst FPs in solo practice or with previous research experience. Conclusion: Recruiting FPs to participate in mental health research and adhere to protocols is challenging and time intensive. To optimize such involvement researchers may need to employ creative strategies unique to study sites, idiosyncrasies of the doctors, and the nature of the topic undergoing study.

Highlights

  • Research is designed to provide evidence to improve health care [1]

  • Predominant reasons for participation were past experience with research projects, interest in the specific topic of mental health care, enthusiasm about self-care, and sense of collegiality. 86.4% (51/59) completed the study entry questionnaire, and 62.7% (37/59) the end of study questionnaire. 66.1% (39/59) submitted at least one positive screening form, with such participation occurring more often amongst family physicians (FPs) in solo practice or with previous research experience

  • FPs indicated that the initial decision to meet with the recruiter was mostly influenced by their interest in depression care, credibility of the research team, and the study topic

Read more

Summary

Introduction

As 95% of health care occurs in the community, research should strive to include family physicians (FPs) and their patients [2]. Members of our research team have recently reported on a mixed literature review of family physicians’ participation in research and observed that such involvement may depend on a complex interplay amongst FPs’ personal and professional characteristics, patient-related factors, and study protocol issues [3]. We opted to explore what factors influence FPs’ decisions to be recruited to and participate in mental health research. For some mental health projects FPs have been reported to be protective of their patients, and of their professional relationships with them [6]. To describe factors associated with family physicians (FPs) recruitment and participation in a mental health research project

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call