Abstract
This article is an inquiry into the legal rhetoric and jurisprudential tensions presented in television series Battlestar Galactica ( BSG) (2003–2009). Gaius Baltar’s trial for treason, which closes the series’ third season, serves as a compelling rumination on collective guilt, vengeance, and injustice, succinctly encapsulating BSG ethos. This study, drawing on rhetorical scholarship, explores the trial’s performative features and through rhetorical analysis illustrates how the legal actors in Baltar’s trial frame justice, set legal precedent, and re-establish community-based order in a tenuous Galactica universe – a universe particularly revealing of post-9/11 anxieties and American jurisprudence in crisis.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
