Abstract
Abstract The membrane-based wet electrostatic precipitator (MWESP), exhibiting good control of PM2.5, has more and more widely applications. Considering traditional flexible collectors’ poor rigidity, this paper presents two modified composite collectors (MCC), smooth PVC plates covered by carbon fiber and glass fiber respectively. This paper tries to make a comparative study of performance characteristic between both the MCCs and a same size smooth PVC collector. We compared the collectors in the aspects as follows: water film thickness, ionic concentration,V-I characteristic and dust collection efficiency. Firstly, we compared the three collectors’ film forming abilities through a water film thickness measure experiment. Secondly, we measured the ionic concentrations and V-I characteristics, getting the electrical characteristics of the three collectors. At last, through an experiment of collection efficiencies, we compared the three collectors’ performance characteristics. The experiment results indicate that MCC with glass fiber not only can guarantee the rigidity of collector, but also proves best wetting properties and best performance characteristic with the water flow rate of 700L/h.
Highlights
The membrane-based wet electrostatic precipitator (MWESP), exhibiting good control of PM2.5, has more and more widely applications
Considering traditional flexible collectors’ poor rigidity, this paper presents two modified composite collectors (MCC), smooth PVC plates covered by carbon fiber and glass fiber respectively
The water flow in MWESPs belongs to the realm of vertical wall falling film
Summary
Abstract: The membrane-based wet electrostatic precipitator (MWESP), exhibiting good control of PM2.5, has more and more widely applications. Considering traditional flexible collectors’ poor rigidity, this paper presents two modified composite collectors (MCC), smooth PVC plates covered by carbon fiber and glass fiber respectively. This paper tries to make a comparative study of performance characteristic between both the MCCs and a same size smooth PVC collector. We compared the collectors in the aspects as follows: water film thickness, ionic concentration, V-I characteristic and dust collection efficiency. We compared the three collectors’ film forming abilities through a water film thickness measure experiment. Through an experiment of collection efficiencies, we compared the three collectors’ performance characteristics. The experiment results indicate that MCC with glass fiber can guarantee the rigidity of collector, and proves best wetting properties and best performance characteristic with the water flow rate of 700L/h
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.