Abstract

This article reinterprets the urban pattern of the oases of southern Tarim Basin, which flourished in the first half of the first millennium C.E. using the dispersed urban complexes framework. Disperse urban centre, also known as a low-density urban complex, is a site that had an urban function, but its morphology was much different from compact cities of, for example, China or mediaeval Europe. Low-density urban complexes, like Tikal in Mesoamerica or Angkor in South-East Asia, despite their distinct urban functions, had the cityscape consisting of intermingled monumental agriculture, water management features and agricultural field. Thus, the oasis-cities of southern Tarim Basin were different from compact urban centres of neighbouring China and western Central Asia and showed some similarities to complexes like Tikal and Angkor. This article evaluates if those sites can be associated with low-density urbanism. Three selected sites, 尼雅 [Niya], 米兰 [Miran] and 樓蘭 [Loulan], have been evaluated for the presence of characteristic associated with low-density urbanism: dispersed monumental architecture, large scale anthropogenic landscapes modifications, and pattern of alternating housing clusters and agricultural fields. This can affect our understating of both the understanding of urbanism in the region and low-density urbanism on the global scale.

Highlights

  • IntroductionFrom a functional point of view, those oases were foci of political, religious and economic activities – which in Europe, China, South-West Asia and the Mediterranean Basin were associated with so-called “urban life”

  • The revised definition proposed by Graham and Isendahl (2018, 176) emphases that “a substantive amount of urban/city space is dedicated to food growing” constitutes an agro-urban landscape

  • In the light of data from the sites of 米兰 [Miran], 尼雅 [Niya] and 樓蘭 [Loulan], the argument can be made that oases of southern Tarim Basin were such landscapes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

From a functional point of view, those oases were foci of political, religious and economic activities – which in Europe, China, South-West Asia and the Mediterranean Basin were associated with so-called “urban life”. This potential dichotomy in social functions and material characteristics might be addressed by evaluating archaeological and historical sources through a low-density urbanism framework. This will allow a better understanding of the function and role of those oases and specific features within them (e.g., clusters of architecture). The narrative of the article will follow three sites,尼雅 [Niya], 米兰 [Miran] or 樓蘭 [Loulan], which were selected due to favourable preservation conditions (fig. 1 a and b)

Objectives
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.