Abstract
This mixed-method study investigated social injustice in higher education produced from the internationalized high-quality program (HQP) characterized by adapting the curriculum from prestigious universities abroad and employing English as the medium of instruction in Vietnam, based on White’s (2010) well-being approach as well as Sen’s (2001) capability approach. Using the questionnaire administered to 120 students and 30 lecturers and semi-structured interviews conducted with eight students in a university in Vietnam, the findings suggested that from subjective dimensions of well-being, the superior features of the HQP and pre-sessional English language training were perceived values of endowments that HQP students and their parents situated themselves in. That established a solid linkage to material dimensions reflected in the possibility of securing the economy after program completion. From the capability approach perspective, although such a disparity in endowments was unjustifiable due to problematic program delivery, there were no different entitlements that might have led to social injustice, providing that students of any program could fulfil their education. The issue of financial affordability relating to the HQP implementation has raised concern about unequal access to educational opportunities for all.
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal of Education, Teaching, and Social Sciences
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
