Abstract

The idea of the welfare state builds on a conception of social rights guaranteed to all citizens (Marshall, 1950). Social rights are an extension of democratic rights, defining welfare rights monitored on the political arena by collective decision-making. Social rights are usually expressed with explicit reference to equality and social inclusion. The issue has repeatedly entered public debate and social planning, promising a great leap forward as in Roosevelt’s New Deal, Johnson’s Great Society or the Swedish social democratic vision of the ‘Folk Home’. The right to employment (supported by labour market policy), to safe working conditions (labour protection regulation), the right to education (tax-based mass schooling), poverty relief (transfers) and general public health care are all widely accepted in Europe in all political camps. However, there is less consensus on just how far social citizenship and the responsibilities of the welfare state should be reaching. This is the field of major political dispute between liberal, conservative and socialist ideology. Believers of the free market tend to see the welfare state, social rights and taxation as an obstacle to market efficiency. Competitiveness is often equated with fairness in the distribution of living conditions, and social rights as disincentives to work. Hence, there is a dual conception of social rights: most people take them for granted and inevitable, but just how comprehensive, residual or targeted they should be, and for what areas in life, is a matter of dispute.KeywordsLabour MarketWelfare StateNordic CountryPurchase Power ParityParental LeaveThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call