Abstract
The usual conclusion in the literature is that sunspots reduce welfare because of the agents. risk aversion. However, if sunspots can lead to escape from an inferior steady state (poverty trap), this conclusion does not necessarily hold. Escaping trajectories can have much higher welfare than those remaining in the poverty trap. The ex.post welfare effect can be positive for initial conditions such that the probability of escape is sufficiently close to one. Numerical simulations of the model support this conjecture.The distance from the poverty trap boundary to the initial condition point is of critical importance where the escape is concerned. I consider a model in which government has an influence on the exact location of the boundary. Implementing a policy that moves the boundary to the initial condition point greatly increases both the probability of escape and the expected welfare gain.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
