Abstract
In many developing countries, consumer food subsidies are major parts of social safety net programs. The primary objective of these programs is to generate a sustained decrease in poverty in these countries. But, due to improper targeting, a large proportion of these food subsidies are “leaked” to high-income groups. Using a computable general equilibrium (CGE) model, the effects of alternative food subsidy reforms on production, foreign trade, households’ welfare and government expenditure in Iran was investigated. These were commodity targeting and cash transfer targeting of the food subsidy for needy groups. Replacing the existing food subsidy program with one targeted to foods consumed heavily in low income households would reduce government expenditure by 4.4 %, increase agricultural exports, reduce non-agricultural exports, and have a negative impact on consumer welfare for all urban consumers, and for all rural consumers except those in the poorest quintile. Replacing the existing program with a cash transfer targeted to poor households would reduce government expenditure by 3.1 %.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.