Abstract

This position paper examines the complex boundaries that separate Europe from both its constructed margins and those of its imagined Others. Where exactly do we enter the Continent and where does it end? Is it while crossing the world-famous bridge on the Bosporus, for instance, that one receives the first impression of Europe, or is it somewhere farther west — past a ‘wall’ protected by a strong border regime? To address these questions, this paper tells two concomitant stories about the practices of urban governance and architectural design in Turkey in the early twentieth century by providing snapshots of numerous encounters and negotiations between multiple actors: American public health specialists, European-trained local bureaucrats, and a French city planner. While Turkey’s dubious position between the West and the East provides the potential for rethinking the boundaries of the Continent, the paper uses the Turkish case primarily to unpack the idea of ‘Europe’ as both a fluid entity and a fixed location, an uneven terrain upon which canonical discourses of identity are constructed. In doing so, it points to the interchangeability of subject positions, which often result in competing narratives of modernization, urban design, and the whereabouts of the line separating Turkey from Europe.

Highlights

  • Collins, who was the representative of the Rockefeller Foundation to Turkey and Bulgaria and the founding dean of the Service School of Hygiene (1932) of the Central Institute of Hygiene in Ankara

  • On occasion, the language in official reports acquired a didactic and even derogatory tone. In his reports for 1926 and 1927, Dr Collins explained the importance of the study trip organized by the Rockefeller Foundation (RF) for the high officials of the Ministry of Health to major European countries: It is felt that this gift of the Board has accomplished a great deal in opening the eyes of the central authorities to the modern developments in European sanitation

  • The Spatial Construction of the Public Health Discourse in Early Republican Turkey’, presented at Writing the Global City: A Tribute to Professor Anthony King, Binghamton University, SUNY, October 4–5, 2013; and ‘Between two Modernisms: Istanbul and Ankara, 1936–1952’, presented at the 11th International Conference on Urban History (EAUH), Prague, August 29–September 1, 2012

Read more

Summary

Introduction

While a new, ‘modern’ city was constructed next to the old one, these plans protected both major historical monuments and traditional dwellings (Wright 1991: 102, 115; Bilsel 2004: 2).4 There were two main reasons why such a protectionist attitude was taken. As Gwendolyn Wright has argued, in Rabat, Casablanca, or the Kasbah of Algiers, the protection of the old city, ancient monuments, and the vernacular building stock validated the exotic, the untamed, and the fixed traditions of the colony rather than the progressive urbanism of Europe (Wright 1991: 112– 13, 120).

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.