Weight estimation in two groups of Ghanaian children with chronic diseases using Broselow, Mercy, PAWPER XL and PAWPER XL-MAC tapes.

Abstract

The performance of various weight estimation methods in children with sickle cell disease (SCD) and heart disease (HD) has not been studied. We aimed to determine and compare the accuracies of the Broselow, Mercy, PAWPER XL and PAWPER XL-MAC tapes in Ghanaian children with no known chronic diseases (controls), SCD and HD. We prospectively recruited 631 children (199 with HD, 209 SCD and 223 controls) from the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital (KATH). Their weights were estimated using the Broselow, Mercy, PAWPER XL and PAWPER XL-MAC tapes. These estimated weights were compared to measured weight using mean percentage error (MPE), the proportion of weight estimates within ±10% (P10) and ±20% (P20) of measured weight. Bland-Altman limits of agreement (LOA) were determined to assess the precision of weight estimation and agreement with measured weight. The PAWPER XL, Mercy and PAWPER XL-MAC were the most accurate in all groups of children studied. All methods except the Broselow tape (BT), which performed best in the control group, had their best performance among children with SCD with negligible critical error rates (proportion of children with weight estimates > 20% of their actual weight). The P20 in the various groups of children using the BT were 88.36%, 80.21% and 51.10% respectively in the control, SCD and HD groups. The Mercy, PAWPER XL and PAWPER XL MAC tapes were generally above 90% in all groups. The Mercy, PAWPER XL and PAWPER XL-MAC tapes performed significantly better than the BT in all groups of children studied. These methods of weight estimation performed best in children with SCD with very little critical error.