Abstract

Using an innovative representation of the weight bound constrained Markowitz's (Portfolio selection. J. Finance, 1952, 7, 77–91) mean-variance model, developed using the support vector data description, a machine learning algorithm introduced by Tax and Duin (Support vector data description. Mach. Learn., 2004, 54, 45–66), we provide an innovative interpretation of the robustness of these bound constraints in terms of robust control theory in the sense of Hansen and Sargent (Robust control and model uncertainty. Am. Econ. Rev., 2001, 91, 60–66). Building on these insights, firstly, we detail the method for quantifying the degree of misspecification in Markowitz's (1952) mean-variance model using its counterpart with weight upper bounds. Additionally, we show that this degree of misspecification is a decreasing piecewise linear function of the bound. Secondly, we empirically investigate two simulation-based methods, inspired by Michaud's (The Markowitz optimization enigma: Is ‘optimized’ optimal? Financ. Anal. J., 1989, 45, 31–42) resampling technique, for choosing the bound. Thirdly, we compare the robustness of the weight upper bound constrained mean-variance model with that of Goldfarb and Iyengar's (Robust portfolio selection problems. Math. Oper. Res., 2003, 28, 1–38) robust maximum return model.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.