Abstract

Many models have been proposed to explain the intergalactic redshift using different observational data and different criteria for the goodness-of-fit of a model to the data. The purpose of this paper is to examine several suggested models using the same supernovae Ia data and gamma-ray burst (GRB) data with the same goodness-of-fit criterion and weigh them against the standard Lambda cold dark matter model (ΛCDM). We have used the redshift—distance modulus (z − μ) data for 580 supernovae Ia with 0.015 ≤ z ≤ 1.414 to determine the parameters for each model and then use these model parameter to see how each model fits the sole SNe Ia data at z = 1.914 and the GRB data up to z = 8.1. For the goodness-of-fit criterion, we have used the chi-square probability determined from the weighted least square sum through non-linear regression fit to the data relative to the values predicted by each model. We find that the standard ΛCDM model gives the highest chi-square probability in all cases albeit with a rather small margin over the next best model—the recently introduced nonadiabatic Einstein de Sitter model. We have made (z − μ) projections up to z = 1096 for the best four models. The best two models differ in μ only by 0.328 at z = 1096, a tiny fraction of the measurement errors that are in the high redshift datasets.

Highlights

  • The universe has been modeled in different ways by physicists, especially since the observation of redshift by Hubble in the early part of the last century

  • Data for 580 supernovae Ia with 0.015 ≤ z ≤ 1.414 to determine the parameters for each model and use these model parameter to see how each model fits the sole SNe Ia data at z = 1.914 and the gamma-ray burst (GRB) data up to z = 8.1

  • The best two models differ in μ only by 0.328 at z = 1096, a tiny fraction of the measurement errors that are in the high redshift datasets

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The universe has been modeled in different ways by physicists, especially since the observation of redshift by Hubble in the early part of the last century. Not satisfied with Doppler effect as the cause of the extragalactic redshift and with the expansion of the universe, alternative models of the universe explaining the redshift were developed, the tired light being the most prominent among those suggested by the Hubble contemporaries [1]. Since the microwave background radiation discovery by Penzias and Wilson in 1964 [2] is most explained by the big-bang expansion model of the universe, most cosmologists consider any other model of the universe to be not worth pursuing with any seriousness. Since on close scrutiny none of the examined models explain the observables as well as the standard big-bang model. The redshift of the extragalactic objects supernovae Ia (SNe Ia) is considered the gold standard of cosmic observations that are used for modeling the universe. Louis Marmet [3] has compiled a summary of various mechanisms used for explaining the spectral redshift of astronomical objects

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call