Abstract
Ontario dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) growers have few options for broadleaf weed control. Sulfentrazone is a group 14 herbicide that provides good control of several common Ontario weed species, and would provide another mode of action for broadleaf weed control if registered for use in Ontario dry beans. Five field studies were conducted during 2014 and 2015 to determine if a low dose of imazethapyr added to a tank mix of sulfentrazone + s-metolachlor would improve broadleaf control in white bean. Sulfentrazone (140 and 210 g·ai·ha-1) was mixed with imazethapyr and s-metolachlor and evaluated at 2 and 4 weeks after crop emergence for crop injury. Weed control was assessed visually at 4 and 8 weeks after herbicide application (WAA), and weed stand counts and biomass were determined at 8 WAA. Seed moisture and yield were determined at harvest. At 8 WAA, sulfentrazone (140 g·ai·ha-1) controlled pigweed species, common ragweed, common lambsquarters, wild mustard, barnyard grass and green foxtail 100%, 4%, 100%, 2%, 86% and 62%, respectively. The addition of imazethapyr (37.5 g·ai·ha-1) to sulfentrazone (140 g·ai·ha-1) improved the control of common ragweed, wild mustard and green foxtail by 19%, 98% and 33%, respectively. The three-way tank mix of sulfentrazone (140 g·ai·ha-1) plus s-metolachlor (1050 g·ai·ha-1) plus imazethapyr (37.5 g·ai·ha-1) controlled pigweed species, common ragweed, common lambsquarters, wild mustard, barnyard grass and green foxtail 100%, 35%, 100%, 100%, 96% and 100%, respectively. The tank mixes evaluated caused unacceptably high levels of crop injury; this study does not support the registration of sulfentrazone plus s-metolachlor + imazethapyr for use in Ontario white bean.
Highlights
In 2015, Ontario growers produced 115,000 tonnes of dry edible beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) on 52,600 ha of land [1]
Sulfentrazone (140 g∙ai∙ha−1) + imazethapyr caused up to 7% injury and sulfentrazone (210 g∙ai∙ha−1) + imazethapyr caused up to 18% injury 4 weeks after crop emergence (WAE). This is consistent with a study by Soltani et al [13], which found that sulfentrazone (140 g∙ai∙ha−1) + imazethapyr (37.5 g∙ai∙ha−1) caused 6% injury and sulfentrazone (280 g∙ai∙ha−1) + imazethapyr (37.5 g∙ai∙ha−1) caused 19% injury in white bean
This study found that PRE applications of sulfentrazone provide excellent control of pigweeds and common lambsquarters
Summary
In 2015, Ontario growers produced 115,000 tonnes of dry edible beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) on 52,600 ha of land [1]. White bean accounted for over half of this production, and has been the prominent market class of dry bean grown in Ontario for several decades [2]. Dry beans are extremely sensitive to weed pressure and do not compete well. Some studies have reported white bean yield losses between 68% and 77% due to weed interference [3]-[5]. Weeds can reduce the quality of the beans through dockage, pick, or plant juices causing discolouration of the seed coat. Weed control is a critical component of dry bean production. One method of controlling weeds is with the use of herbicides
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
