Abstract
<span>University website is the platform for university to interact with people. It is also an interphase for people to infer and getting known about the university. In addition, quality of the university website is vital to let people get positive response to the university. Therefore, university website should be evaluated for better performance. This study evaluate website of Malaysian Technical University (MTUN) on year of 2016 based on the criteria selected using online web diagnostics tools. There are nine criteria selected to measure the website; load time, response time, page rank, traffic, design optimization, page size, number of items, markup validation and broken link. The result shows website of UMP performed better in design optimization, page rank and markup validation. Meanwhile, UTHM performed in page rank, load time and page size. UTEM excellences in response time, number of items and broken link. Lastly, UniMAP performed in traffic criteria only. However, the (MTUN) University website is almost not meets with the criteria that selected with the quality standard that have been suggested. </span>
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
