Abstract

This article evaluates a testing procedure for collecting eye-gaze data with toddlers and preschoolers during a word-learning task. We provide feasibility and precision data by comparing performance in an in-person version of the study (conducted under controlled conditions in the lab), with performance in a virtual version in which participants completed the testing procedure from home. Our data support the feasibility of collecting remote eye-gaze data with young children, and present it as a viable alternative for conducting developmental language research when in-person interactions with participants cannot take place. Additionally, we use this methodological approach to examine a topic that has gained popularity in recent years—the role of music and songs on vocabulary learning. We provide evidence suggesting that while songs may help increase attention during a particular task, greater attention does not lead to greater learning. In fact, preschoolers show improved word-learning performance for items that were trained in a spoken sentence compared to items that were trained in a song. This means that while songs may be beneficial for increasing child engagement, spoken sentences may be best for supporting deep level learning of language concepts.

Highlights

  • Over the last 50 years we have seen important shifts toward new testing paradigms that would help shape theories of language acquisition

  • We examined how many analyzable trials were collected for children who completed the virtual version of the task, compared to children who had completed the in-person version

  • To answer our last research question, we examined whether the testing procedure that we had implemented with toddlers, could be successfully used with 47–50 month-olds to test their ability to learn novel words in the song and spoken conditions, and whether there were any age-related differences in performance between toddlers and this slightly older group

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Over the last 50 years we have seen important shifts toward new testing paradigms that would help shape theories of language acquisition. Remote Testing of Word Learning (Hollich et al, 2000; Halberda, 2003; Newman et al, 2018) and word comprehension (Fernald et al, 2001; Swingley and Aslin, 2002; Houston-Price et al, 2007; Morini and Newman, 2019), in children as young as 6 months (Tincoff and Jusczyk, 1999; Bergelson and Swingley, 2012) Traditionally, this paradigm required participants to visit the lab, where children would be tested in a controlled environment (i.e., a quiet room with minimal distractions), using the same equipment across participants (i.e., the same screen, speakers, and video camera). This is true, when it comes to finegrained measures such as eye-gaze and testing of young children who inherently have limited attention and cooperation spans

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call