Abstract

Wing area, wing loading, and aspect ratio are key variables for studies of avian comparative ecology, despite the complexity of measuring wing characteristics in living and museum specimens. The systematic databases of feather photographs available on the Internet may offer an alternative way of obtaining such morphometric data. Here, we evaluate whether measurements of scanned feathers from web photograph databases may offer reliable estimates of avian morphometry.Published data on wing area were obtained for 317 bird species and feather measurements from web photograph databases for 225 of them. A variable termed “lift generation area,” a proxy for wing area, was calculated for each species on the basis of the mean length of the five distal secondary feathers and wingspan data from literature. The fit between this proposed variable and data extracted from the literature was examined by correlation, employing linear regression to explore the lack of fit among species.“Lift generation area” proved to be highly informative as a proxy for wing area for the study species as a whole (R 2 > .98). Discrepancies observed between species were strongly negatively associated with the size of the original sample used to calculate wing area (p = .001) and, to a lesser extent, with bird size (p = .023), but not with aspect ratio. It was also found that the mean value of the mismatch between “lift generation area” and wing area (13.1%) among the study species as a whole was of similar magnitude to that found between sources of bibliographic wing area data for the 64 species for which two published estimates of this variable were available (15.3%).We conclude that measurements made from feather photograph databases are reliable for use in studies of avian comparative ecology, enabling the inclusion of biomechanical parameters of many more species than featured at present.

Highlights

  • The comparative study of the morphology and aerodynamics of flying animals has revealed the constraints and physical laws that govern flight, including the existence of general scaling functions between weight, wing loading, and cruising speed across birds (Greenwalt, 1962; Hedenström, 2002; Norberg, 2002; Tennekes, 2009)

  • It must be highlighted that the degree of fit of the variable based on digital feather images is more than sufficient for it to be used with equal confidence than traditional wing area measurements for analyses across bird taxa

  • The procedure could be used to compute proxy variables for aspect ratio or wing loading that are based on wing area measurements

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

The comparative study of the morphology and aerodynamics of flying animals has revealed the constraints and physical laws that govern flight, including the existence of general scaling functions between weight, wing loading, and cruising speed across birds (Greenwalt, 1962; Hedenström, 2002; Norberg, 2002; Tennekes, 2009). The relationship between low wing loading and slow cruising speed in relation to mass is a recurrent finding among animals (from butterflies to vultures and other terrestrial soaring birds), which are strongly limited by the maximum power that they can generate (Tennekes, 2009) In this context, wing area and aspect ratio (the ratio between the square of wingspan and wing area) are two key variables employed in avian comparative morphology, and both rely on the measurement of wing areas (Andrews et al, 2009; Buler et al, 2017; Vágási et al, 2016; Viscor & Fúster, 1987; Warham, 1977). We examined whether a combination of bibliographic data on avian wingspans and direct measurements of secondary wing feathers allows an acceptable estimation of wing areas In such an event, comparative ecology studies will be able to benefit from the mass of data contributed by citizen science, offering reliable morphometric variables for a much greater number of bird species than is currently available in the form of careful measurements of live birds or collection specimens

| MATERIALS AND METHODS
Findings
| DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call