Abstract

This paper presents an investigation on the use of quasi-static analyses with explicit integration to evaluate the web crippling behaviour of cold-formed steel beams. Web crippling failure occurs due to the application of transverse concentrated loads, which can be applied statically or dynamically. In the majority of the examples found in the literature, the web crippling phenomenon has been investigated by means of purely static shell finite element (SFE) models with implicit integration. In this work, the ABAQUS code was employed to implement SFE models aimed at replicating an experimental test and quasi-static analyses with an explicit integration scheme were adopted. First, a brief literature review on the topic of the numerical investigation of web crippling of cold-formed steel members is presented. Then, the paper addresses the characterisation of the quasi-static analysis concept with particular emphasis on the control of dynamic effects and the SFE model of a lipped channel beam under External Two Flange (ETF) loading is described. Several conventional parameters of standard SFE analysis, such as the SFE type, mesh selection, steel model, hardening effects due to cold-forming, residual stresses, initial imperfections and support conditions are explained, as well as additional specifications pertaining to the adoption of quasi-static analyses, such as the load rate, mass scaling, contact and friction, smoothed amplitude curves and inhibition of inertia (noise) effects. Finally, the results obtained are presented in the context of the ETF case, including load–displacement curves, curves of kinetic-to-internal energy ratio vs. displacement and beam deformed shapes (failure modes). It is concluded that explicit analysis leads to rigorous simulations of experimental test results, in terms of ultimate load, post-collapse load–deflection curve and failure mechanism. The failure mode obtained with the quasi-static analysis provides a better approximation of the one observed experimentally than its non-linear static analysis counterpart. Indeed, the failure mechanism emerges considerably more clearly when the quasi-static analysis is adopted.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.