Abstract

ABSTRACT FOUR water table management methods were compared in computer simulations of a controlled-drainage and subirrigation system using soils and climate conditions of the Mississippi Delta region. No significant difference in the predicted relative corn yield was obtained among the four management methods when the operation for each method was adjusted to maximize yield. However, stopping subirrigation pumping whenever the rainfall probability index (RPI) exceeded 55% reduced pumping requirements for three of the methods 12 to 21% compared to the continuous subirrigation method. The optimal management of soil-water for agricultural cropland in humid, coastal areas of the U.S. often involves complex daily control of the water table because of the erratic spatial and temporal distribution of rainfall. Periods of excess and deficit soil-water conditions are common within the same growing season. Thus, water management requires both controllable drainage and irrigation facilities. A water table management system popular in the humid region, especially in the southern coastal plains, uses a subsurface draintube system for both controlled-drainage and subirrigation. Controlled-drainage permits storage of rainfall and irrigation water in the soil profile below the depth of an overflow pipe at the drain outlet. Free'' drainage to the full depth of the drainline is often needed during periods of extended or heavy rainfall to reduce the duration of excess water in root zone. During subirrigation, the water level at the drain outlet is maintained just below the overflow pipe by pumping from an external source. A sump-type structure for controlling the water level at the drain outlet for a water table management system is illustrated in Fig. 1. The check-valve, activated by a double-float, allows fast subsurface drainage during peak flow events, functioning like the two-stage weir described by Fouss, et al. (1987b). It is often necessary to pump from a sump in level and low lying topography of the coastal plains, where subsurface drainage by gravity flow is not possible. Water table management with this type of system has a high potential for achieving maximum crop production and water use efficiency if properly controlled to compensate for changes in weather conditions. The timing of changes needed in controlled-drainage and subirrigation to manage optimally the water table depth is a major problem for farmers, especially in coastal areas with fine textured soils. In the Mississippi Delta frequent occurrences of rainfall can cause large variations in water table depth because of the small, 3 to 8%, drainable soil porosity. Results from computer simulation of four management methods for water table control are presented for soils and climate conditions of the Mississippi Delta. The primary research objective was to determine the best operational parameters that efficiently utilized rainfall during the growing season without creating periods of severe excess soil-water conditions, and which minimized the need for pumping drainage and subirrigation water. Special attention was given to the potential use of rainfall probability information from the daily weather forecast as a system control input to minimize subirrigation pumping.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call