Abstract
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of a wearable integrated volitional control electrical stimulation (WIVES) device that has been developed as more compact and simpler to use in daily life compared with conventional integrated volitional control electrical stimulation (IVES) devices. DesignRandomized controlled non-inferiority trial. SettingConvalescent rehabilitation ward. ParticipantsPatients with paresis of the upper extremity (UE) after early subacute stroke (N=20). InterventionsEligible patients were randomized to receive IVES treatment or WIVES treatment for 8 hours per day for 28 days in daily living, in addition to standard rehabilitation treatment. In both groups, the extensor digitorum communis on the affected side was the target muscle for stimulation. Main Outcome MeasurePrimary outcomes were assessed with Fugl–Meyer Assessment of the UE (FMA-UE) before and after treatment. Non-inferiority was determined with a specified margin of non-inferiority. ResultsTwenty patients completed the trial (IVES group: n=10, WIVES group: n=10). FMA-UE improved in both groups. The mean change in FMA-UE was 4.7 for the IVES group and 6.0 for the WIVES group (P>.05, 95% confidence interval: −6.73 to 4.13). The mean difference between the groups was 1.3, and the upper 95% confidence interval did not exceed the non-inferiority margin. ConclusionThe effectiveness of WIVES treatment is non-inferior to that of IVES treatment. As a portable device, IVES may facilitate the use of affected upper extremities in daily living and may help improve paresis of the UE.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.