Abstract

The present contribution on tool wear during the drilling of carbon fiber composite materials (CFRP)/Ti stacks intends to determine (i) if the adhesion of titanium to carbide is mechanical or chemical, (ii) the possible diffusion path, (iii) if the titanium is the only element involved in the adhesion and (iv) the role of the CFRP in this wear. The overall tool wear is not the sum of the wear in each material and there is a multiplicative effect between them. It has been pointed out that the maximum temperature reached during drilling is higher than 180 °C, 400 °C and 750 °C respectively in the CFRP and Ti plates alone and in the Ti part of the stack. As tungsten carbide CW is not in equilibrium with titanium above 250 °C, the diffusion path is CW/(Ti,W)C/Ti as confirmed by Auger analysis. For temperatures above 500 °C, (Ti,W)C becomes very sensitive to oxidation allowing a friable oxycarbide (Ti,C,O) to form, which explains the erosion of the tool. The CW is therefore the weakest link in the drilling of CFRP/Ti stacks. Improving the performance of the tool involves the use of a coating, the development of a tool material having low chemical affinity with Ti and/or the use of cryogenic lubricant.

Highlights

  • In the CFRP plate alone, the thrust force increases with the number of holes realized (Figure 6) but the level of the load remains quite force increases with the number of holes realized (Figure 6) but the level of the load remains quite low with respect to the Ti alloy case

  • In the CFRP plate alone, the thrust force increases with the number of holes realized (Figure 6) but the level of the load remains quite low with respect to the Ti alloy case

  • This study demonstrates that improving the performance of the tool involves the use of a coating, and/or the development of a tool material having low chemical affinity with Ti, and/or the use of a cryogenic lubricant

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Importance of Tool Wear in Aerostructure Drilling. Aeronautical manufacturing, and in particular structural assembly, has undergone profound transformations towards ever higher levels of automation. The crossroad is obvious: automate processes or relocate production. The reasons for thinking about automation are several: cost reduction, quality improvement, and increased safety at work. The weight of manual activity in the aeronautical assembly remains high and represents between. 25% and 75% of the total cost of the structure. All possibilities for improvement in these operations translate into savings opportunities and among them the automation of elementary processes (drilling, sealing, riveting...) or even the entire process are options that are beginning to be consolidated

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call