Abstract
Macroprudential policy improves economic outcomes by reducing the likelihood and severity of financial crises. Yet, are there unintended long run consequences to the introduction of a macroprudential policy regime, and are they conditional on the level of wealth inequality? I answer these questions by looking at the effect of a reduction in the maximum loan-to-value (LTV) ratio on homeownership rates, house prices and housing wealth inequality across two economies with different initial wealth dispersion. I use a heterogeneous agent model in which households face an endogenous borrowing limit in the form of a collateral constraint. A reduction in the LTV limit tightens the borrowing constraint and changes the levels of wealth at which households rent or become constrained or unconstrained owners. The key finding of this paper is that initial conditions matter; a greater share of households is affected when wealth is distributed more equally. This larger impact on aggregate demand leads to a stronger fall in house prices and a larger rise in the share of constrained homeowners and housing wealth inequality. The effects are also non-linear in the LTV ratio, with progressively stronger effects at lower LTV ratios.
Submitted Version (
Free)
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
