Abstract
ABSTRACTBulman-Fleming et al. [1] introduced the properties flatness, (principal) weak flatness and torsion freeness of S-posets over pomonoids S, and presented the implication: “principal weak flatness ⇒ torsion freeness”. Golchin et al. [3] described flatness, weak flatness and principal weak flatness of right S-posets AS over a pomonoid S in terms of pullback preservation by the tensor multiplication functor AS⊗−. In this note we first show, by giving a counterexample, that this implication of Bulman-Fleming et al. is incorrect. Afterwards we provide examples that deny these descriptions of Golchin et al. In view of the above, we finally study another property of S-posets (we call it weak torsion freeness), which is weaker than principal weak flatness, and characterize pomonoids by this property.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
