Abstract

ABSTRACT The work of the eighteenth-century English ecclesiastical courts has received very little scholarly attention when compared with their seventeenth- or nineteenth century counterparts or the eighteenth-century temporal courts. And yet there was significant overlap between the two systems, particularly between the ‘disciplinary’ work of the ecclesiastical courts and the ‘criminal’ work of the temporal courts. Using a heuristic of ‘weak’ legal pluralism, this article examines the work of the ecclesiastical courts and shows that neither system can be understood adequately without reference to the other.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.