Abstract

This article critically examines how undergraduate students in a red brick university in the North of England have experienced the threefold rise in tuition fees since 2012, with particular attention on how they have begun to understand and negotiate the process of indebtedness. Drawing on a corpus of 118 interviews conducted with a group of 40 undergraduates across their whole student lifecycle, analysis is directed toward examining how students have variously sought to respond to the policy, reconcile the debt with their decision to study at university and, begin to negotiate a life of everyday indebtedness. The findings are located in the context of wider neoliberal policy trends that have continued to emphasise ‘cost-sharing’ as a mechanism for increased investment within the higher education sector generally, and individual fiscal responsibility specifically. Given the lack of any other viable career pathways for both lower and higher income students, they had to accept indebtedness as inevitable and take what comfort they could from the discourses of ‘foregone gain’ that they had been presented with. Evidently, and as the students in our sample well recognised, whether those discourses actually reflect the future remains to be seen. There is also no evidence within our data that students anticipated the subsequent changes to the repayment terms and conditions – a fact that is likely to compound feelings of economic powerlessness and constrain their capacity for financial agency yet further.

Highlights

  • The changes made to the system of funding Higher Education in England in 2012 restated the UK Government’s commitment to mass education on one hand, whilst further enhancing the ‘privatisation of social risk’ on the other (Palfreyman & Tapper 2014; Antonucci 2016)

  • Drawing on the results of an innovative three-year longitudinal study that followed a group of undergraduates at an English Northern Red Brick University across their ‘whole student lifecycle’ (Bathmaker et al 2016; Purcell & Elias 2010), this paper makes a contribution to this emerging literature by exploring how post-2012 students have responded to the financial landscape they operate within

  • Concentrating on the debt incurred directly from Student Finance England, this paper aims to address these concerns by outlining how post-2012 students reacted to the imposition of the new tuition fee and maintenance grant regime, how they proceeded to understand their indebtedness, and, how they are beginning to absorb it into their financial understandings and practices

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The changes made to the system of funding Higher Education in England in 2012 restated the UK Government’s commitment to mass education on one hand, whilst further enhancing the ‘privatisation of social risk’ on the other (Palfreyman & Tapper 2014; Antonucci 2016). Drawing on the results of an innovative three-year longitudinal study that followed a group of undergraduates at an English Northern Red Brick University across their ‘whole student lifecycle’ (Bathmaker et al 2016; Purcell & Elias 2010), this paper makes a contribution to this emerging literature by exploring how post-2012 students have responded to the financial landscape they operate within It charts how they have started to understand and negotiate the process of increased financial liability accrued from tuition fees and maintenance grants, and in doing so, demonstrates how their experiences of indebtedness in situ relate to both past understandings of debt and their future expectations of managing it.

The Research Study
Age years
Other or missing
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call