Abstract

Two new but similar approaches to California mussel (Mytilus californianus) size prediction using archaeological fragments, are compared with known mussel biology. Some assumptions, traditional in zooarchaeology but unfounded zoologically, have made prediction formulae that are likely to be generally inaccurate. A standard statistical exploratory technique shows archaeologically informative underlying structure in the data.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.