‘We shouldn’t be told to shut up, we should be told we can speak out’: Reflections on using arts-based methods to research disability hate crime

Leah Burch

doi:10.1177/14733250211002888

Abstract

The concept of hate crime has been subject to ongoing debate among academics, practitioners and policy-makers. Yet for many disabled people, this concept remains to be ambiguous and conceptually ‘fuzzy.’ In this article, I reflect upon the use of arts-based methods in order to explore disabled people’s understandings and experiences of hate crime. Specifically, I offer methodological reflections on how the process of making mood-boards can invite participants to revisit personal experiences, prompt sensitive and supportive discussions, and present knowledge in more creative ways. I also consider some of the difficulties involved with arts-based methods, particularly where such activities can evoke discomfort. Despite these methods creating some challenges, this article supports the use of arts-based methods as enabling a more collaborative and participatory research process. In particular, I argue that these alternative methods provide an opportunity to sensitively explore potentially upsetting topics such as hate crime.

Highlights

Arts-based methods, captured under the broader paradigm of creative methods (Kara, 2015), can be understood as ‘research that uses the arts, in the broadest sense, to explore, understand, [and] represent’ human experience (Savin-Baden and Wimpenny, 2014: 1)
I reflect upon the use of arts-based methods to open up these conversations and explore the sensitivities of hate crime in participatory and collaborative ways
I have reflected upon the methodological decisions underpinning this research

Summary

Introduction

Arts-based methods, captured under the broader paradigm of creative methods (Kara, 2015), can be understood as ‘research that uses the arts, in the broadest sense, to explore, understand, [and] represent’ human experience (Savin-Baden and Wimpenny, 2014: 1). Arts-based methods have offered a unique means of understanding hate within the context of everyday life and in particular, the different ways that people come to make sense of, negotiate, and resist such experiences. I reflect upon the use of arts-based methods to open up these conversations and explore the sensitivities of hate crime in participatory and collaborative ways.

Results

Conclusion