Abstract

This article critically examines the consequences of different levels of public participation in decision-making processes for chronically disadvantaged and marginalised people. We present a case study of a public consultation commissioned by the UK government as part of a broader study into the feasibility of resettlement of the Chagos Archipelago, a remote British Overseas Territory in the Indian Ocean. The UK government has a long and troubled history of entanglements with the Chagossian community. We argue that the government and the consultants it commissioned failed to engage with this complex history, leading to particular challenges in establishing trust among community members and hindering the effectiveness of the consultation process. We show that consultations are not neutral, one-off ‘fact-finding’ endeavours but politically loaded exercises with lasting consequences for communities in terms of power, participation and vulnerability. We conclude that those involved in commissioning or conduct...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.