Abstract

BackgroundProductive failure simulations require students to participate in a simulation before receiving instruction. This approach contrasts with traditional simulations that typically begin with instruction followed by the simulation. Although previous studies have demonstrated that productive failure facilitates meaningful learning outcomes, students’ perspectives after being exposed to this approach have not been examined in simulation-based learning. ObjectiveTo explore nursing students’ perceptions of a productive failure simulation. DesignDescriptive exploratory study. ParticipantsUndergraduate nursing students from one large metropolitan Australian university. MethodsStudents involved in a productive failure simulation were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews on completion of their simulation experience. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and the qualitative data were subjected to thematic analysis. FindingsFifteen small group interviews and seven individual interviews were conducted (n = 66). Three themes emerged from the analysis of the qualitative data: (i) the benefits of simulation prior to instruction; (ii) the value of performing a second simulation; and (iii) the importance of normalising errors. ConclusionThe productive failure simulations helped students identify their knowledge and skill deficits and this acted as a catalyst for their learning. The normalisation of errors by the educator minimised the stress of trying to be “perfect” and assisted students to persevere despite setbacks. The provision of a second simulation helped the students rectify their errors in preparation for their future clinical practice. These aspects were considered essential for a meaningful productive failure simulation experience.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call